Category: Public Affairs

  • Ofcom publishes consultation on postal pricing 

    Ofcom publishes consultation on postal pricing 

    It has recommended a targeted means-tested discount scheme, but has not recommended the inclusion of publishers or bulk mail users in the discount scheme. 

    In addition, Ofcom is considering issues around a lack of price controls for downstream access providers, and what solutions may be appropriate. 

    Sajeeda Merali, CEO, PPA said: “Many publishers rely on second-class post as an essential, affordable way to reach their readers, and ongoing price rises have already put significant strain on the sector. Any regime that excludes publishers from postal discounts would have a commercial impact for many.

    It’s disappointing that magazines and publishers were not directly referenced in Ofcom’s reports, instead being grouped under the broad category of ‘bulk mail users. A more accurate and informed understanding of the publishing sector’s specific challenges would be welcome.

    The PPA will continue engaging closely with our members to provide a comprehensive response, but our position of deep concern over the cost of second-class post and its impact on publishers remains clear. Affordability and access are vital if publishers are to continue serving their audiences and communities effectively.”

    The PPA are currently engaging with members to develop a response, ahead of the deadline of 5 December. For more information about the consultation, see here and to speak to our team about the consultation contact our Head of Policy & Public Affairs eilidh.wilson@ppa.co.uk

  • Government confirms delay to new subscription rules

    Government confirms delay to new subscription rules

    The new rules were enshrined in law in the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 and require publishers to meet certain requirements around cancellation, renewal notices, and cooling-off rights.

    The government had previously stated that the enforcement was planned for Spring 2026. However, this has been delayed in recognition of the fact that “all stakeholders, particularly businesses, need time to prepare for implementation”.

    The PPA worked closely with members to participate in the government’s consultation process to design the guidance that prescribes how businesses should adhere to the new regime.

    The government has said it will provide further details on timings in the government response but has not given an indication of when this response will be published.

    If you have any questions, please get in touch with Eilidh Wilson, Head of Policy and Public Affairs, PPA (eilidh.wilson@ppa.co.uk)

  • The Competition and Markets Authority rules Google has substantial market power 

    The Competition and Markets Authority rules Google has substantial market power 

    This allows the CMA to consider proportionate, targeted interventions to ensure that general search services are open to effective competition, and that consumers and businesses that rely on Google can have confidence that they are treated fairly.   

    While Gemini isn’t included under the designation, it does cover AI offerings specific to Google search services, such as the AI overviews and AI mode. 

    This outcome was expected; however, it’s a significant milestone. It is the first designation made by the UK’s new digital platform regulator; the first company to be designated within a specific market; the first time a regulator has had the legal framework to oversee a big tech platform under UK sovereign law; and the first instance of ex-ante regulation, allowing intervention as issues arise rather than years later. 

    The PPA continues to work closely with the CMA and will be working with members to consult on the proposed conduct requirements.  

    Sajeeda Merali, CEO, PPA said: “We welcome the CMA’s decision to designate Google Search with Strategic Market Status. It’s the correct decision and addresses Google’s current monopoly. 

    It’s particularly encouraging to see Discover, AI Overview, and AI Mode included in scope. This demonstrates an understanding that search is evolving, and that publishers must have a say in how their content is used. In the upcoming November consultation, we will further advocate for appropriate protections for our world-leading publishers and the trusted editorial content they produce. 

    This is a critical opportunity to rebalance the digital marketplace and foster greater competition, building a healthier ecosystem overall. We’re ready to play an active role in shaping this next phase to deliver a fairer, more sustainable digital ecosystem.” 

    On the back of the designation, the CMA will publish a set of proposed conduct requirements for Google to address its entrenched market power.  

    Will Hayter, Executive Director for Digital Markets, CMA, said: “By promoting competition in digital markets like search and search advertising we can unlock opportunities for businesses big and small to support innovation and growth, driving investment across the UK economy.  

    We have found that Google maintains a strategic position in the search and search advertising sector – with more than 90% of searches in the UK taking place on its platform.   

    Having taken into account the feedback received following our proposed decision, we have designated Google’s search services with strategic market status.” 

    If you have any questions, please get in touch with Eilidh Wilson, Head of Policy and Public Affairs, PPA (eilidh.wilson@ppa.co.uk) 

    Further reading 

    Media Briefing: Why some publishers are flipping their position on whether to block AI bots. Read here (DIGIDAY subscription needed). 

    To see further details on the PPA’s recommendations ahead of the CMA’s decision, please see our submission here.  

  • Trump’s state visit: UK signs tech deal

    Trump’s state visit: UK signs tech deal

    The deal commits both governments to cooperation on AI and other emerging tech, and it also includes £31 billion of investment from US tech firms.

    While there are no binding agreements on regulation and copyright, it does say that a focus area of collaboration between the countries will be leading the development of “harmonised, responsible, pro-innovation policy and regulation”.

    The UK government is still consulting with the creative and tech industries on its approach to AI and copyright. The PPA has been engaging directly with the government on this and will continue to push for better regulatory conditions that would combat infringement.

    You can read the Memorandum of Understanding here.

    If you have any questions, please get in touch with Eilidh Wilson, Head of Policy and Public Affairs, PPA (eilidh.wilson@ppa.co.uk).

  • EU confirms second delay to Anti-Deforestation Regulation (EUDR)

    EU confirms second delay to Anti-Deforestation Regulation (EUDR)

    The delay follows ongoing concerns regarding the readiness of the supporting IT infrastructure required to enforce the legislation.

    Originally scheduled to come into force in December 2025, the EUDR seeks to reduce global deforestation driven by EU consumption. It will prohibit the import of commodities, including cattle, coco, coffee, palm oil, rubber, soy, and timber-derived products such as magazine paper, unless they can be proven not to contribute to deforestation.

    PPA members, along with publishers globally, have consistently raised concerns about the lack of clarity and preparedness surrounding the regulation. There has been limited guidance from Brussels on how to navigate the practical complexities of compliance across the intricate news and magazine supply chain exporting into the EU and NI.

    Under the regulation, non-compliance could result in products being detained or confiscated at the border, alongside significant financial penalties. To mitigate these risks, publishers and their supply chain partners will be required to submit detailed due diligence reports, including geolocation data identifying the specific forest(s) from which the pulp used in paper production was sourced. 

    To support PPA members in preparing for EUDR compliance, we will publish a concise guidance document in early October. This will include practical advice and input from across the value chain, outlining a standardised industry approach to meeting the regulation’s requirements.

    If you have any questions, contact the PPA’s Membership Manager on David.Bostock@ppa.co.uk

  • Cabinet reshuffle: new ministers across various departments

    Cabinet reshuffle: new ministers across various departments

    Following the resignation of former Deputy PM, Angela Rayner, Keir Starmer has announced a cabinet reshuffle, whilst also reappointing ministers to various departments.

    Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS)

    DCMS remains largely the same, with Secretary Lisa Nandy remaining in post. Former Minister for the Creative Industries, Chris Bryant, whose portfolio was closely aligned with the policy areas at the PPA, has been moved to the Department for Business and Trade (DBT). His post has been taken on by Ian Murray who has also been assigned as a minister within the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), similar to Bryant.

    Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT)

    DSIT has undergone one of the most significant changes, with a new Secretary of State and two new ministers.

    Liz Kendall is the department’s new Secretary, with Ian Murray and Kanishka Narayan becoming ministers. Feryal Clark, who oversaw AI, has now been moved to the backbenches.

    The scale of change at DSIT mirrors wider Cabinet moves in departments facing pressure on major policy areas. In the case of DSIT, AI and copyright have been prominent issues for the department, making the reshuffle particularly noteworthy. More broadly, most changes across government have been reassignments to other posts rather than dismissals, with Number 10 seeking to reset policy delivery in key areas.

    Department for Business and Trade (DBT)

    Peter Kyle, who was the Secretary for DSIT, is now Secretary for DBT. Chris Bryant joins him in this department. Justin Madders, who was responsible for digital markets, competition and postal regulation, has left DBT and is now on the backbenches.

    We are yet to see the full briefs of new and reassigned ministers. However, once these are confirmed, we will be working alongside industry stakeholders to brief ministers on our key issues.

  • PPA Responds to ICO Consultation on Online Advertising Regulation

    PPA Responds to ICO Consultation on Online Advertising Regulation

    The PPA has submitted a response to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) consultation on its regulatory approach to online advertising. In our submission, we emphasised the importance of Government using its powers to create a more enabling environment for publishers, specifically by extending PECR – Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations, exemptions on consent requirements to include data sharing with third parties for advertising purposes.

    We highlighted that the privacy risks in this area are marginal, given the vast availability of personal data online (particularly that controlled by large platforms), and that genuine digital anonymity is now virtually non-existent.

    Our response also underlined that publishers cannot sustain viable advertising models on contextual or consent-less inventory alone. Continued access to personalised advertising is critical to maintaining quality, independent content and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the sector.

    The consultation comes as the ICO sees a change in leadership, with William Malcolm, a former Google lawyer, replacing Stephen Almond as regulatory lead. We are engaging with the ICO to arrange a meeting between Malcolm and PPA members to discuss these issues in more detail.

    You can read our full response here.

  • Google contests having a search monopoly

    Google contests having a search monopoly

    The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has published Google’s formal response to the proposed designation of its search and advertising services under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act (DMCCA).

    Alongside industry stakeholders, Google was expected to comment on the proposals and will have further opportunities to provide evidence and comments later in the year. As expected, Google challenged the CMA’s findings, particularly around the idea that it holds substantial and entrenched market power.

    Key points from Google’s response

    Google’s response covers a range of the CMA’s determinations on market power, switching, competition from AI, and the scope of regulation:

    1. Default search position
      Google argues its default settings (eg. on Android) don’t block rivals, as users choose Google for quality, and notes that competitors like Microsoft have strong defaults (eg. Bing on Windows)

    2. Switching is easy
      Google has claimed users can easily switch search engines, citing Android’s choice screen and behaviour on Windows, where Google isn’t the default but remains widely used

    3. Market is dynamic
      Points to rapid AI developments (eg OpenAI and Perplexity adding ads) as evidence of a fast-changing market where Google’s power isn’t locked in long-term

    4. Regulatory uncertainty
      Warns that the designation could create ‘substantial uncertainty… impacting UK businesses and consumers’

    Despite Google seeking to reframe its position on market dominance, evidence from PPA members shows clear changes in traffic and audience behaviour following the rise of Google’s AI Overviews. This product further entrenches Google’s dominance and creates significant barriers for publishers operating in digital ecosystems.

    The PPA has submitted evidence to the CMA, setting out recommendations for conduct requirements to ensure greater transparency, consent, and fairness. You can read more about these recommendations here.

    If you have any questions, please get in touch with Eilidh Wilson, Head of Policy and Public Affairs, PPA eilidh.wilson@ppa.co.uk

  • How Google AI offerings are harming publishers: PPA submits recommendations to the Competition and Markets Authority

    How Google AI offerings are harming publishers: PPA submits recommendations to the Competition and Markets Authority

    The PPA has submitted recommendations (read in full here) to the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) for Conduct Requirements it should place on Google Search services under the new digital markets regulatory regime.

    We also presented evidence from PPA members and anonymised case examples to demonstrate the immediate market harms of AI overviews and other Google AI products.

    Context

    In June this year, the CMA published its provisional decision to designate Google with “Strategic Market Status” (SMS) in the areas of general search and search advertising. This gives the regulator the ability to impose specific Conduct Requirements on Google to tackle barriers to competition in this part of their services.

    The CMA has invited the PPA to input on what requirements around reporting would be useful to publishers, in relation to Google’s AI offerings. The increased presentation of AI overviews and the newly released “AI Mode” have become a significant concern for publishers, as they divert traffic away from original sources by providing summarised answers directly within (or in place of) search results. Publishers report rising impressions but falling click-through rates (also known as the “crocodile” phenomenon), disrupting the long-standing link between visibility and engagement.

    The experiences of publishers are backed up by research, which confirms that Google users are less likely to click on result links when visiting search pages with an AI overview compared with those without one[1].

    Despite publishers reporting an almost 50% drop in traffic, Google claims that overall traffic remains stable, but acknowledges there is a shift in the type of sites that users are visiting[2]. However, Google haven’t published any data to substantiate this.

    The recommended Conduct Requirements from the PPA are designed to give publishers control over how their content is used by Google and force Google to expose the harm its practices are inflicting on publishing businesses.

    The PPA’s recommendations

    To support more competitive conditions in Google Search and Ad Services, the PPA has recommended the following Conduct Requirements:

    • Transparency reporting on crawling, which distinguishes between crawling conducted for search indexing and crawling conducted for the creation of AI overviews, AI Mode, and any successor AI products that aggregate and summarise content.

    • Transparency reporting in Search Console to show where and when publisher content appears in AI-powered Search Engine Results Page features like AI overviews, AI Mode, and AI overviews in Google Discover.

    • Transparency for acquisition sources in Google Analytics.

    • Requiring clear attribution and functional linking when publisher content is used in AI overviews, AI Mode, and Google Discover.

    These changes would help ensure publishers retain control over how their work is used, while protecting the value of original content in an increasingly AI-driven search environment. The CMA will continue to gather evidence from publishers and other relevant stakeholders and set out its next steps in the coming months.

    Case examples

    Lifestyle magazine – traffic lost due to AI answers

    A lifestyle publisher shared data on a popular search query, “how to get rid of [insect].” Despite the article still ranking on page one and impressions remaining relatively steady, the click-through rate fell sharply from 5.1% to 0.6% over the past year.

    This decline is not in line with the small change in ranking or visibility and points to a significant change in how users interact with search results. The query now triggers an AI overview that provides a full answer directly on the results page. It includes highlighted steps, removing the need for users to click through.

    This example shows how AI overviews can undercut revenue for high-performing content by replacing the user journey to trusted sources with an on-page summary. This is particularly problematic for publishers who rely on search-driven discovery for articles on travel tips, home décor, and wellness, as it results in reduced ad impressions, diminished newsletter sign-ups, and lower overall brand visibility.

    Automotive content publisher – devaluing evergreen, high-investment articles

    One automotive publisher investing in detailed car benchmarking content reported a 25% drop in traffic to articles ranking first in organic search, despite a 7% increase in search visibility. Over the same period, their click-through rate declined from 2.76% to 1.71%.

    This type of “evergreen” content requires significant editorial investment. It includes expert vehicle testing, specification comparisons, and guidance designed to support high-value purchasing decisions. The publisher’s commercial model relies on attracting large volumes of traffic to generate advertising and affiliate revenue.

    The observed gap between visibility and engagement highlights the harm posed by AI overviews. Although the content remains visible in search results, users are increasingly consuming the summary provided by Google without visiting the original source.

    E-Commerce & affiliate magazine – eroding partnership revenue

    A publisher who specialises in product reviews and purchasing advice through articles such as “best” lists has reported that AI overviews appear between 30 and 37% of the time and that the click-through rate from search is typically 25-50% lower when an AI overview appears.

    For one of the publisher’s websites, the session’s impact is in the range of -2.9 to -7.7% compared to a version of the Search Engine Results Page in which AI overviews do not exist. The site’s evergreen search, which includes high-intent keywords landing on reviews and best lists, has been reduced by -7.5% to -18.7%. The publisher also estimates the total revenue impact on this one site to be between 2.4% and 6.5% purely due to the rollout of AI in the Search Engine Results Page.

    The revenue for this publisher is derived not only from advertising but also from affiliate marketing, which depends on website users clicking through to partner sites after reading comparison articles. The reduction in traffic from AI overviews has undermined these income sources.

    If you have any questions, please get in touch with Eilidh Wilson, Head of Policy and Public Affairs, PPA (eilidh.wilson@ppa.co.uk)

    Sources

    [1] Pew Research Center (2025) Google users are less likely to click on links when an AI summary appears in the results (Source)

    [2] Google (2025) AI in Search is driving more queries and higher quality clicks (Source)

  • Conservative Party shadow cabinet reshuffle

    Conservative Party shadow cabinet reshuffle

    The reshuffle includes new shadow Secretaries of State for Culture, Media and Sport, and for Science, Innovation and Technology. The shadow Secretary for Business and Trade remains unchanged (Andrew Griffith MP)

    Shadow Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT)

    Julia Lopez has been appointed as Shadow Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, replacing Alan Mak.

    Shadow Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS)

    Nigel Huddleston has been appointed as Shadow Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, replacing Andrew Stuart.

    The role of Shadow Secretaries of State and Ministers is to scrutinise and hold the current Government to account, as well as reflect the policy positions of the opposition party.

    The PPA will be contacting the respective members to introduce our positioning on our priority policy areas for the publishing sector.